Tuesday 26 March 2013

Negotiating The Void - clarence lee




 

Wooden Void (Linear)
I started on the wooden void first because it was to me the hardest to craft. As such, I poured the most effort and thought into this model. 

Wood to me is a highly sacred material. It has a high sculptural potential that requires much skill, which I currently lack. Knowing that wood tends to be very linear, I wanted to challenge this conventional property. I first asked myself what are the qualities or concepts that I wanted to capture with this wooden void. When I referred to the acetate cone, the contours visually stood out and it immediately triggered an idea of wooden rings that seem to levitate and float freely. I then thought back to the overarching qualities that my klecksograph initiated. Upon contemplation, I felt that if I could harmonise the qualities of complexity, simplicity and balance, it would tie in nicely with my initial motivation to create the chosen klecksograph. As the klecksograph circle represented the nature of life to me, the wooden model should then represent the qualities of complexity, simplicity and balance - ideas that are inextricably connected to the nature of our existence. Complexity can be represented by the warped rings that seem to float. Simplicity can be represented by the overall shape that these "rings of complexity" create - a cone that is a basic geometric shape. Balance can be represented by the precarious nature in which the the rings are stacked upon one another to allow an inverted cone to stand. This boldness to me, completes the metaphor - a paradoxical attempt to seek out what might essentially be simple through complex ways and thereby derive a sense of meaning to our life. 


Paper Void (Planar)
When I first started work on the paper model, I wanted to the model to represent the imaginary "cylinders" that connected the contours on the surface of my acetate cone.

Next, I began to question the properties of paper. I wanted to bring out its potential as a material. Paper as a material has a highly planar property. It is hard to give it a curvilinear property as it demands much skill from the craftsman. It is however easy to fold it to create angularity. To me, the strongest quality of paper is through its interaction with light and shadow. A crisp white surface of paper can give one a sense of purity and directness. When it is complemented with curvilinear properties and treated with proper lighting, it can appear extremely sensuous. When it is complemented with angular properties, it can appear paradoxically brutal and graceful at the same time. 

However, I admit that I was lazy in my approach and did not want to "waste" time exploring these properties further. This feeling of frustration triggered an idea to crush the paper so that it can take upon a property that is unconventional. This direction delighted me because crushed paper is less resistant to the attempts to mold it. This simplified the task greatly.

As I worked on the paper model, I thought to myself that by simply stacking these hollow paper rings in the shape of a cone, it would be far too boring. I felt that if I gave each ring a tilt, it might visually appear more interesting.

My only regret is that I did not spend more time exploring these properties. The following is a link to a Japanese artist whose paper art really pushes the properties of the given material. 

http://yukonishimura.com/index.php



Wire Void (Curvilinear)
For the wire void, I wanted to give the void between the contours a physical manifestation. I felt that the wire could best fulfill this intent because it seems almost instinctive that the wire can easily resemble chaos. I did not want to force a linear property on the wire this time around and so I fully embraced its curvilinear nature instead.

 I started randomly twirling the wires around to give the central core of the acetate cone a physical form. The central core would be the thickest in terms of the amount of wire devoted to its creation, while the outermost void would use the least amount of wire. This is so that the viewer can quickly identify it has the core. 

5 comments:

  1. Your preoccupation with representation, resemblance and identity seem to be tied in to materials rather than space. Would love to see how you apply the same intellectual energy to the space within.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Wooden Void" is an oxymoron. Unravel that and you have the answer to your material versus space dilemma.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you sir for the feedback! It's like a Zen Koan!

      This void that you mention; is it the imaginary form that we invite the viewers to "see" in their mind's eye? Is it an abstraction that can only manifest in one's consciousness (no-thing) rather than a physical form (thing)?

      It is an interesting idea to apply this preoccupation with representation, resemblance and identity to space. It is like building upon the intangible to create greater emotional depth as compared to simply giving intangible qualities to tangible forms. I'm afraid that this idea would not manifest so early in my craft because it demands great spiritual and intellectual maturity which I lack heh

      Delete
  3. The answer to both your questions is, No: The void mentioned in the brief is precisely what is meant - an emptiness, or vacuum if you like. Whatever you put in the void can't be the void itself. It can be suggested or prompted by the void, but here's where many get tripped up. The void is nothing if not for its enclosure, the real physical something - in our case it's the contour lines on the acetate, the ink, not the acetate, as the latter by its transparency is meant to disappear. Thus the visual connection between the contour lines from one side of the primitive to the other - across the void - is the abstraction we're trying to give form to by using physical things such as the paper, wood and wires. If you load the visual with cultural experiences (zen, Christian, pantheism, etc.) then you might end up with representation. If you go by just the physical reality on the other hand, you might get a physical form led by mathematical patterns and principles. Or you might decide to go for something that's a bit of both. But whichever, you' be getting only half the lesson if you don't see the space that is formed by the form you put in the void. In the end, it's the orchestration of space we're interested in, but that might only become more apparent in Week 5's programme.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for your input sir! On hindsight, I think I might have gotten carried away with my current design philosophy (and therefore limit its maturity); got to keep exploring the other approaches! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete